When sexual assault occurs, most survivors learn about the criminal justice process first. A police report leads to a criminal investigation, which may or may not result in charges, which may or may not result in a conviction. Throughout that process, the survivor is a witness, not a party. The prosecutor represents the state, not the survivor. The outcome of a criminal case determines what happens to the perpetrator. It does not directly compensate the survivor for what was taken from them. A civil claim does.
Contents
The Civil Process Belongs to the Survivor
In a civil sexual assault case, the survivor is the plaintiff. The case proceeds on their timeline, toward their goals, and for their benefit. A civil judgment can provide compensation for medical and therapeutic costs, lost income, and the non-economic harm that sexual assault causes, including trauma, emotional distress, and loss of quality of life. None of these outcomes are available through the criminal system regardless of whether the perpetrator is convicted.
The civil process also moves independently of the criminal one. A survivor can pursue a civil claim even when the DA declined to prosecute, even when the perpetrator was acquitted, and even when the statute of limitations on criminal charges has passed. An experienced California sexual assault attorney can evaluate the civil options available in a specific situation without waiting for the criminal process to reach any particular outcome.
The Burden of Proof Is Lower in Civil Court
Criminal prosecution requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard in the law. Civil cases require proof by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not that the assault occurred. This lower threshold means that many cases that could not result in a criminal conviction can succeed in civil court, where the standard reflects accountability rather than punishment. For survivors whose cases never reached a criminal charge, the civil standard is often more realistic than they initially expect.
California’s Extended Statute of Limitations
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 340.16, as amended by AB 2777, extends the civil statute of limitations for adult survivors of sexual assault. For most claims, the deadline is the later of ten years from the date of the assault or three years from the date the survivor discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, that a psychological injury or illness resulted from the assault. The discovery rule is significant for survivors who experienced delayed recognition of the connection between the assault and harm they suffered years afterward.
AB 2777 also created a temporary revival window for claims that had previously expired. That window has closed, but the extended standard limitations periods remain in place for current and ongoing claims. Understanding which deadline applies to a specific situation requires a legal analysis of when the assault occurred and what the survivor knew or could have known at each point.
When the Perpetrator Had Institutional Support
Sexual assault perpetrators often operate within institutions that enabled, ignored, or concealed the abuse. Employers, schools, religious organizations, and sports programs all have civil liability when their negligence allowed the assault to occur. Civil cases against institutions are often more financially meaningful than cases against individual perpetrators, because institutions carry liability insurance and have assets that can satisfy a judgment. Identifying institutional defendants alongside the individual perpetrator is one of the first analytical tasks in building a California civil sexual assault case.
The California Legislature’s text of Code of Civil Procedure Section 340.16 sets out the current limitations periods and the conditions under which they apply. Survivors who are uncertain whether their claim is still timely should seek a legal evaluation before assuming the deadline has passed.
